nattuw skrev 2024-06-09 06:50:42 följande:
Bias är när du utan förbehåll tar till dig ett narrativ för att det ligger i linje med det för dagen rådande socialdemokratiska narrativet.
Källkritik är när du förbehållslöst tittar på vilka ekonomiska eller politiska incitament som källan kan tänkas ha.
Suck... Källkritik är inte samma sak som att kritisera upphovsmakaren... Vad lär sig folk egentligen nu för tiden..
www.hiof.no/bibliotek/english/how-to-write-a-paper/source-criticism/What is source criticism?
Source criticism means that you critically evaluate the quality of the information on the basis of your needs and independent of medium.
..Qualitative evaluation of the source
Who is the text written for?
What genre does the text belong to?
What is the purpose of the text?
Is the text fact related or does it express the sender's opinions?
Is the text objective?
Is the information extensive and balanced?
Are there possible conflicts of interest?
The sources of the text
Does the author refer to other sources?
What kind of sources are they?
Author
Who is the author of the text?
What are the author's qualifications? Is s/he recognised as having knowledge in this area? Is s/he affiliated with an institution?
Make a new search to find out more about the author and her/his other works.
Publisher
Who is the publisher of this document?
Is it an acknowledged publisher?
What does this publisher usually publish; do they specialise in special subjects or issues?
Make a search to find out more about the publisher/publishing house and the other publications.
Time of publication
When was the text written?
Has a new edition been published?
Is the material up to date?
You should also find out whether it is a primary or secondary source. Primary sources are original works with the words and ideas of the author; secondary sources are reports or interpretations of the primary source.
Anybody can publish on the Internet so be aware of this when evaluating web sources.
Evaluating the relevance of the source
Is the field covered by the source relevant to your information need?
According to your problem statement:
What is it you wish to find the answer to?
What kind of information do you need? - Facts, argumentation, observation?
In what way can the source throw light on the questions you are asking?
Are your key concepts present in a primary position such as title, list of contents, summary or conclusion?
Analysis of the text:
What does the author wish to communicate?
How is this communicated?
How is the text relevant to or referring to other texts?
Comparing sources:
Compare the text to other texts of the same type
Compare the argumentation
Compare quality control
Make further searches
Fact box of source criticism
bias
= a tendency to believe things that reinforces a persons previous beliefs or ideology.
deepfake
= an artificial image or film produced by computers in order to seem true or real.
disinformation
= false information being deliberately spread.
fake news
= invented information resembling real news but created with the goal to distort facts or to mislead the reader.
filter bubble
= can lead to a state of isolation where the information a person reads only mirrors one's existing beliefs or ideology.
infodemic
= the spread of unverified information related to a specific crisis or event. Rapid and uncontrolled dissemination, leads to speculation or anxiety.
misinformation (or false information)
= the unintentional spread of wrong or misleading information.
primary source
= the source where the information or the research results are published for the first time.
pseudoscience
= beliefs mistakenly considered as scientific, for example astrology.
secondary source = a source commenting on, analyzing, or summarizing existing research.
troll farm = a group of persons systematically spreading disinformation online.
Sources: Oxford English Dictionary and Nationalencyklopedin