Hur hjälper vi barn med Autism, Adhd eller Add?

Du försöker bara få läsare att inte vilja få tillgång till ackurat information,genom att skriva som du gör, de förklaras också i föreläsningen varför många runt om internet gör så också. Ni har inget att vinna på de, tvärt om. 

.. och blanda själv inte in det icke vedertagna "HSP" i TS röra...

Spektrumet spänner över hela mänskligheten, efter autismens högupplösta sinnen kommer sedan högkänsliga människor, det tonas sedan vidare ut i majoriteten/normala

Tittar man på filmen så förstår man ju att ni manipulerar och försöker vilse leda läsare att inte ta till sig informationen i filmen som har högst vetenskaplig evidens.

Ju mer diskussion de blir i tråden desto mer uppmärksamhet får ju dessutom videon. 

Icke att beblanda med diagnoser ur DSM-5, för att vara specifik. (Er bådas röra då:))

Nej, kanske inte förvånad egentligen att du gav dig in i ett slikt resonemang om något som är omgärdat av skepsis: "vad jag vet så är ASD överkänsliga och har svårt att hantera samma mängd input som övriga klarar utan problem medan HSP är högkänsliga och tar in mer input. Jag brukar se det som att ASD har svårare att processa intryck som ljud medan HSP har bättre hörsel.

Jag tycker det verkar som du blandat ihop ASD och HSP".

I've been performing interesting experiments in proffering my opinions and finding that some of the men out there respond on the grounds that my opinion is wrong, while theirs is right because they are convinced that their opinion is a fact, while mine is a delusion.

- Rebecca Solnit

Autism / Asperger Syndrome

"Sensory processing problems can cause real pain: even non-verbal individuals with autism can have a problem with sensory overload. Some people are really helped by Irlen Colored Lenses."
- Temple Grandin, Ph.D.

"I know of several children and adults (with Asperger's Syndrome) who have reported a considerable reduction in visual sensitivity and sensory overload when wearing Irlen lenses."
- Tony Attwood, Ph.D., Associate Professor at Griffith University in Queensland, Australia, The Complete Guide to Asperger's Syndrome

Types of Problems

The Irlen Method is not a cure for Autism or Asperger Syndrome. Not every individual with Autism and Asperger Syndrome suffers with perceptual problems, light sensitivity, and sensory overload. The Irlen Method is a piece of the puzzle for some individuals. Typical problems that can be helped by the Irlen Method are:

(1) Sensory Overload caused by bright lights, fluorescent lights, and sunlight. Lighting is stressful; and this results in behaviors to filter out the light, poor eye contact, and physical symptoms such as anxiety or headaches.

(2) Environmental Distortions where the individual sees the world in a distorted fashion. Objects are blurry, moving, changing, and can disappear. People may look frightening, stairs may look like a slide without steps, and walls and floors may swing and sway. Misperceptions can cause difficulties with sustained attention, eye contact, gross and small motor coordination, ability to interpret facial expressions, and poor social skills.

(3) Print Distortions make learning or reading difficult. The individual may have good or even advanced reading skills but has trouble with reading comprehension or experiences strain and fatigue when reading or doing other activities. Tracking or building breaks into reading may be a problem.

(PDF) A psychometric evaluation of the highly sensitive person scale: the components of sensory-processing sensitivity (2018)

ABSTRACT

Objective: Aron and Aron (1997) developed the Highly Sensitive Person Scale (HSPS) to measure individual differences in sensory-processing sensitivity (SPS). Their experiments showed that sensitivity is a one-dimensional construct characterized by high susceptibility to both external (e.g. light, noise) and internal (hunger, pain) stimuli (Aron 2013), later studies which were conducted using the HSPS, disagreed their concept. Further studies of the SPS construct are justified by the following: a Russian version of HSPS questionnaire has not yet been developed; the inner structure of the construct has not yet been conclusively defined (Aron and Aron, 2012), a different method of statistical data analysis may be required; the vast majority of studies, were using small homogeneous groups for sampling. Thus, the purpose of the present study was the psychometric evaluation of the Highly sensitive person scale using Russian data samples.

Method: Two approaches ? active and passive - were employed to collect the field data. The active approach used verbal advertising among undergraduate university students, i.e. the ?snowball method?, whereas the passive approach relied on social media advertisements in Facebook and VK.com. 860 respondents participated in the study: 350 undergraduate university student volunteers (117 males, 233 females, average age 18.2) and 510 social media users (380 females, 130 males, average age 22.6).

Results: The results of this study did not confirm the one-dimension model of sensitivity suggested in Aron and Aron (1997), nether was the three-factor model suggested by others. The hierarchical cluster and confirmatory analyses employed for the operationalization procedure suggest that sensory processing sensitivity (SPS) can be described in a two-factor model consisting of ?Ease of Excitation? and ?Low Sensory Threshold? subscales. The ?Aesthetic Sensitivity? factor was identified during hierarchical cluster analysis, but showed very low correlation with the other factors ?Ease of Excitation? and ?Low Sensory Threshold?. This result encourages us to look deeper into the conceptual model of HSPS developed in Aron and Aron (1997).

Conclusion: The operationalization of the Russian version of HSPS confirmed that the SPS is multidimensional construct. The precise number of subscales remains open. The term sensitivity has many meanings in modern psychology, a more rigorous definition of the sensitivity construct is required.

www.researchgate.net/publication/329547542_A_psychometric_evaluation_of_the_highly_sensitive_person_scale_the_components_of_sensory-processing_sensitivity

(PDF) The functional highly sensitive brain: A review of the brain circuits underlying sensory processing sensitivity and seemingly related disorders
2018

Abstract:
During the past decade, research on the biological basis of sensory processing sensitivity (SPS)-a genetically based trait associated with greater sensitivity and responsivity to environmental and social stimuli-has burgeoned. As researchers try to characterize this trait, it is still unclear how SPS is distinct from seemingly related clinical disorders that have overlapping symptoms, such as sensitivity to the environment and hyper-responsiveness to incoming stimuli. Thus, in this review, we compare the neural regions implicated in SPS with those found in fMRI studies of-Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Schizophrenia (SZ) and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) to elucidate the neural markers and cardinal features of SPS versus these seemingly related clinical disorders. We propose that SPS is a stable trait that is characterized by greater empathy, awareness, responsivity and depth of processing to salient stimuli. We conclude that SPS is distinct from ASD, SZ and PTSD in that in response to social and emotional stimuli, SPS differentially engages brain regions involved in reward processing, memory, physiological homeostasis, self-other processing, empathy and awareness. We suggest that this serves species survival via deep integration and memory for environmental and social information that may subserve well-being and cooperation. This article is part of the theme issue ?Diverse perspectives on diversity: multi-disciplinary approaches to taxonomies of individual differences?.

(PDF) The functional highly sensitive brain: A review of the brain circuits underlying sensory processing sensitivity and seemingly related disorders
2018

Abstract:
During the past decade, research on the biological basis of sensory processing sensitivity (SPS)-a genetically based trait associated with greater sensitivity and responsivity to environmental and social stimuli-has burgeoned. As researchers try to characterize this trait, it is still unclear how SPS is distinct from seemingly related clinical disorders that have overlapping symptoms, such as sensitivity to the environment and hyper-responsiveness to incoming stimuli. Thus, in this review, we compare the neural regions implicated in SPS with those found in fMRI studies of-Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Schizophrenia (SZ) and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) to elucidate the neural markers and cardinal features of SPS versus these seemingly related clinical disorders. We propose that SPS is a stable trait that is characterized by greater empathy, awareness, responsivity and depth of processing to salient stimuli. We conclude that SPS is distinct from ASD, SZ and PTSD in that in response to social and emotional stimuli, SPS differentially engages brain regions involved in reward processing, memory, physiological homeostasis, self-other processing, empathy and awareness. We suggest that this serves species survival via deep integration and memory for environmental and social information that may subserve well-being and cooperation. This article is part of the theme issue ?Diverse perspectives on diversity: multi-disciplinary approaches to taxonomies of individual differences?.

www.researchgate.net/publication/323420482_The_functional_highly_sensitive_brain_A_review_of_the_brain_circuits_underlying_sensory_processing_sensitivity_and_seemingly_related_disorders

Normalt brukar man svara på kritik med riktiga argument eller "hade missat det" Man bifogar också källor som bevis för att påståendet om högst vetenskaplig evidens är korrekt.

När någon bemöter kritiken med något konspirationsteoretiskt om de som kritiserar säger det en hel del om vilken nivå det är på "filmen" och dess påstådda vetenskapliga evidens, det är så folk brukar försvarar sina flummiga  teorier som saknar vetenskaplig grund.[...]

Intressant. 

"Teoristadiet", då menar du inte teori som ett mer vetenskapligt begrepp, antar jag? (I pseudovetenskapen används "teori" som något man tar med "en nypa salt").

Ja, man kan alltid titta på forskning, även på den lite udda. Men man ska inte satsa helt och hållet på den, utan även vara öppen för annat.