nattuw skrev 2018-03-18 21:31:20 följande:
Hur ser USA:s lagar ut när det gäller användandet av personuppgifter?
Med tanke på att google, facebook och linkedin har obehagligt mycket uppgifter om sina användare och att det saknas reella alternativ skulle det vara intressant att veta.
Japp det är lite på sidan men inte desto mindre en viktig frågeställning.
Det går bra att läsa user agreement för tjänsterna - de som använde appen i fråga på fejjan gav tillstånd att använda personliga uppgifter för forskningssyfte. Men de såldes alltså vidare till cambridge analytica som använde dem för Project Alamo
www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-trump-data-firm-facebook-profiles-20180317-story.html
"
"In 2014, after hearing feedback from the Facebook community, we made an update to ensure that each person decides what information they want to share about themselves, including their friend list," the statement said.
Facebook on Friday banned Kogan, the parent company of Cambridge Analytica and a former Cambridge employee for improperly sharing the data and failing to destroy it after concerns arose about it in 2015. Facebook had asked the parties back then to certify they would not abuse data, but it did not take further action beyond that warning."
"Trump's campaign paid Cambridge Analytica at least $6 million for data analysis in the final five months of a close election."
Mer om project alamo
semantiko.com/trump-fake-news-factory/
www.bbc.com/news/av/magazine-40852227/the-digital-guru-who-helped-donald-trump-to-the-presidency
Om Trumps anklagelser om förekommande valfusk
www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/6/30/15900478/trump-voter-fraud-suppression-commission
"The White House claimed in its latest statement that there is “substantial evidence of voter fraud,” even though it has provided no such evidence. Trump similarly claimed on Twitter, without any evidence whatsoever, that “millions” of people voting illegally had cost him the popular vote in the 2016 election.
Here’s the thing: There is absolutely zero evidence for anything Trump has claimed.
Trump’s main source for his claims is an old Pew report, whose authors have repeatedly said that it does not support Trump’s claim at all. That report doesn’t even look at voter fraud, but rather at America’s lackluster technology for registering voters."
Varför ville Trump ha namnen på registrerade röstare och dessutom alla Hispanic i Texas? Vad skulle Trump ha dem till? Varför köper Trump demografisk data och namn?
www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/trump-election-fraud-commission-bought-texas-election-data-flagging-hispanic-voters/2018/01/22/2791934a-fd55-11e7-ad8c-ecbb62019393_story.html"President Trump’s voting commission asked every state and the District for detailed voter registration data, but in Texas’s case it took an additional step: It asked to see Texas records that identify all voters with Hispanic surnames, newly released documents show.
In buying nearly 50 million records from the state with the nation’s second-largest Hispanic population, a researcher for the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity checked a box on two Texas public voter data request forms explicitly asking for the “Hispanic surname flag notation,” to be included in information sent to the voting commission, according to copies of the signed and notarized state forms"
"Told of documents showing the Texas purchase, Kobach said, “Mr. Williams did not ask any member of the commission whether he should check that box or not, so it certainly wasn’t a committee decision.”
Such “information does not, did not advance the commission’s inquiry in any way, and this is the first I’ve heard the Texas files included that,” Kobach said Friday.
Kobach said: “I don’t know what sort of data analysis you would do even remotely relevant to it, but also having just one state” would be “useless. It just doesn’t make any sense.”"
Vem är denna Kobach som initierade Trumps köp av röstlängder?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kris_Kobach
"As Secretary of State of Kansas, Kobach implemented some of the strictest voter ID laws in the United States, and has fought to remove nearly 20,000 registered voters from the state's voter rolls.[13] Despite considerable investigation and prosecution, Kobach secured only nine convictions for voter fraud. All were cases of double voting; most were older Republican men who had misunderstood their voting rights, and not one would have been prevented by his strict voter ID "SAFE" Act.[14][15][16][17] "