Amerikanska valet - Vem ser du helst som president av dessa?

Den här historien säger en hel del om hur Hillary ses på av stora delar av USA:

.

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are in a bar. Donald leans over, and with a smile on his face, says, "The media are really tearing you apart for that scandal."

Hillary: "You mean my lying about Benghazi?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "You mean the massive voter fraud?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "You mean the military not getting their votes counted?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

[etc...]

Hillary: "I give up! ... Oh wait, I think I've got it! When I stole the White House furniture, silverware and China when Bill left Office?"

Trump: "THAT'S IT! I almost forgot about that one".

Newt Gingrich förklarar varför eliten inte kan förstå Trumps framgångar:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/5/newt-gingrich-what-they-never-understood-about-don/ 

The answer is simple. It wasn’t Trump that the media and political elites failed to understand. It was the American people. 

The American people were dramatically more fed up with Washington—with the incompetence, the arrogance, the corruption, and the failure—than Washington could begin to understand.

Americans increasingly saw that normal politicians on both sides of the aisle could at best only manage the decline. The country was concluding that real change would require real change: someone who was different enough and daring enough to force genuine reforms. And over the course of the campaign, more and more Americans came to believe that only a personality as bold and revolutionary as Trump could, in fact, make America great again. 

The elites could not (and still cannot) understand this appeal because they do not recognize the problem—namely, themselves.

.

Det är omöjligt att inte dra paralleller till hur SD hanterades av den svenska politiker- och medie-eliten.

Varför Hillary Clinton kan komma att tvingas vittna under ed två gånger inom en snar framtid, dvs mitt under presidentsvalkampanjen.

Det handlar om den mejlserver hon satte upp i källaren hemma och vilken typ av material hon förvarade på denna:
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/05/05/gregg-jarrett-why-hillary-may-soon-be-answering-questions-under-oath.html?intcmp=hpbt2

Almost no one in the federal government knew that Clinton had set up a private electronic server in the basement of her home to be used exclusively for all her official business as Secretary of State.  Years later, when the story broke, she insisted she did it for her own convenience.  U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan seems skeptical.

The judge now wants to know if Clinton created the server for the purpose of circumventing federal open-records laws. Public officials work on behalf, and for the benefit, of the public. In turn, the public has a right to look at her work. A specific law, the Freedom of Information Act, permits journalists and others to gain access to, and examine, her emails.  But journalists had to sue Clinton and the State Department to get them to adhere to the law. 

...

The FBI’s investigation of Clinton and her aides is a separate, but related case. Different than the civil FOIA lawsuit, the feds are looking into potential criminal conduct. 

Why? Because knowingly storing classified information at an unauthorized location is a crime.  (18 USC 1924) Clinton’s server was unauthorized.  Some 2,200 classified documents were contained therein, plus another 22 which were marked "top secret". That law exists to protect national security. 

Och där kom den första undersökningen som visar att Trump leder över Clinton:
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/278366-poll-trump-has-2-point-lead-over-clinton

Sex månader kvar till valet.

"Landningen"?

Ledningen, förstås ...